Networks of reader and country status: an analysis of Mendeley reader statistics

نویسندگان

  • Robin Haunschild
  • Lutz Bornmann
  • Loet Leydesdorff
چکیده

The number of papers published in journals indexed by the Web of Science core collection is steadily increasing. In recent years, nearly two million new papers were published each year; somewhat more than one million papers when primary research papers are considered only (articles and reviews are the document types where primary research is usually reported or reviewed). However, who reads these papers? More precisely, which groups of researchers from which (self-assigned) scientific disciplines and countries are reading these papers? Is it possible to visualize readership patterns for certain countries, scientific disciplines, or academic status groups? One popular method to answer these questions is a network analysis. In this study, we analyze Mendeley readership data of a set of 1,133,224 articles and 64,960 reviews with publication year 2012 to generate three different networks: (1) The network based on disciplinary affiliations of Mendeley readers contains four groups: (i) biology, (ii) social sciences and humanities (including relevant computer sciences), (iii) bio-medical sciences, and (iv) natural sciences and engineering. In all four groups, the category with the addition “miscellaneous” prevails. (2) The network of co-readers in terms of professional status shows that a common interest in papers is mainly shared among PhD students, Master’s students, and postdocs. (3) The country network focusses on global readership patterns: a group of 53 nations is identified as core to the scientific enterprise, including Russia and China as well as two thirds of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. Subjects Data Science, Databases, Network Science and Online Social Networks

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published?

Mike Thelwall, University of Wolverhampton, UK. Purpose –Mendeley reader counts have been proposed as early indicators for the impact of academic publications. In response, this article assesses whether there are enough Mendeley readers for research evaluation purposes during the month when an article is first published. Design/methodology/approach – Average Mendeley reader counts were compared...

متن کامل

Why Do Papers Have Many Mendeley Readers But Few Scopus-Indexed Citations and Vice Versa?1

Counts of citations to academic articles are widely used as indicators of their scholarly impact. In addition, alternative indicators derived from social websites have been proposed to cover some of the shortcomings of citation counts. The most promising such indicator is counts of readers of an article in the social reference sharing site Mendeley. Although Mendeley reader counts tend to corre...

متن کامل

Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?

Counts of citations to academic articles are widely used as indicators of their scholarly impact. In addition, alternative indicators derived from social websites have been proposed to cover some of the shortcomings of citation counts. The most promising such indicator is counts of readers of an article in the social reference sharing site Mendeley. Although Mendeley reader counts tend to corre...

متن کامل

Mendeley as a Source of Readership by Students and Postdocs? Evaluating Article Usage by Academic Status

This paper explores readership counts provided by the social reference manager Mendeley as a source for usage statistics for scientific papers, based on a sample of 1.2 million documents published in journals from the four disciplines Biomedical Research, Clinical Medicine, Health and Psychology. It is shown that the percentage of papers with at least one user on Mendeley (65.9%) as well as the...

متن کامل

Identification of the Features of E-reader Applications and Evaluation of Widely Used Iranian Applications

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the features of e-reader applications through a systematic review of texts, and also to evaluate four widely used Iranian e-reader applications (Fidibo, Taghche, Ketabrah, ketab sabz) in terms of identified features. Method: The present redearch is an applied study in terms of purpose that was conducted on the basis of a systematic review frame...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • PeerJ Computer Science

دوره 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015